Nature Factor (Fair Use): Definition and Legal Significance

---

Definition

The “Nature of the Copyrighted Work” is the second factor considered in a fair use analysis under U.S. law (17 U.S.C. §107). It examines the character of the original work to determine how strongly it should be protected.

This factor asks whether the work is factual or creative, and whether it has been published. Courts use this to evaluate if the use of the copyrighted content leans toward or against a fair use defense.

How Courts Evaluate the Nature Factor

This factor focuses on two core aspects of a copyrighted work: how creative it is and whether it has been published. Courts weigh these elements to decide if the use of a work leans toward fair use. Generally, factual and published works receive less protection than creative or unpublished ones, making them more likely candidates for fair use.

Creative Works vs. Factual Works

Creative works include novels, films, poetry, music, photography, and fictional content. Courts typically grant these works stronger protection because they represent original expression. When someone reuses highly creative content without permission, the risk of infringement is higher, especially if the new work lacks transformative value.

Factual or informational works include news reports, scientific data, instruction manuals, and academic papers. These types of works are grounded in publicly accessible knowledge, not original storytelling. Since facts can’t be copyrighted, courts are more lenient when someone reuses content drawn from these sources, particularly for education or commentary.

Published vs. Unpublished Works

Unpublished works are protected more strictly because authors hold the exclusive right to control the first public appearance of their work. Courts hesitate to allow fair use when the original creator hasn’t yet decided to publish or distribute the content. The use of unpublished letters, manuscripts, or drafts usually weighs against fair use.

Published works, by contrast, are more likely to support a fair use argument – especially if the new use is educational, nonprofit, or transformative. While publication doesn’t automatically justify reuse, courts recognize that once a work is available to the public, limited, purpose-driven copying may be more acceptable.

Practical Implications

Understanding the nature of the original work helps users gauge their legal exposure when reusing copyrighted content. This factor alone doesn’t determine fair use, but it can influence how courts interpret the overall case. Knowing whether the source is factual or creative, published or unpublished, gives creators and educators a clearer framework for responsible reuse.

Favorable Fair Use Conditions

Reusing factual content generally supports a fair use argument. For example, quoting statistical data or citing scientific findings in a research paper or news report often aligns with public interest and educational goals. Courts typically allow limited use of these types of works because they contribute to informed discourse and do not infringe on original expression.

Referencing published material in commentary or analysis, such as quoting from a news article during a podcast review, also favors fair use. These uses typically involve transformation or interpretation rather than duplication. Citing published sources within essays, lectures, or criticism further enhances the legitimacy of the use, especially in nonprofit or academic contexts.

Unfavorable Fair Use Conditions

On the other hand, using large excerpts from unpublished materials like personal diaries or private letters is more likely to weigh against fair use. Courts give strong deference to the author’s right to control how and when their work is disclosed.

Copying creative works without transformation, such as song lyrics or full poems used on blogs or websites, also reduces fair use viability. These uses often substitute for the original and deprive creators of licensing opportunities, making them legally risky even in non-commercial settings.

Case Law Examples

These landmark cases illustrate how courts interpret the Nature Factor in fair use analysis. They focus on whether the original work is factual or creative, and whether it was published or unpublished at the time of use.

Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises (1985)
The Court ruled against fair use because the work was the unpublished memoirs of President Ford. The unpublished nature weighed heavily against the defendant.

Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone (1991)
A white-pages-style phone directory was ruled to contain facts, not original expression. The Court found that copying factual data did not infringe copyright.

Google Books (Authors Guild v. Google, 2015)
Google’s snippet views of published books were considered fair use. The published, factual nature of the works helped support the decision.

Controversies & Gray Areas

Not all applications of the nature factor are clear-cut. Emerging technologies and creative uses create new challenges.

Databases & Compilations: Collections of facts (like sports stats or recipes) may gain thin protection if there is originality in selection or arrangement.

AI Training Data: Ongoing litigation questions whether using creative works to train large language models (LLMs) constitutes fair use. Courts have yet to draw consistent lines.

Fanfiction & Remixes: Fan-created stories based on copyrighted fictional universes use highly creative content. While often tolerated, they legally infringe unless allowed by the rights holder.Memes & Social Commentary: These often remix creative works but may qualify as fair use depending on the purpose (e.g., parody or critique). Still, the nature factor usually weighs against them.

How to Apply the Nature Factor

The nature factor is part of a holistic four-factor test. Still, understanding this component helps in evaluating fair use strength.

For Content Creators

Content creators should prioritize using factual sources whenever possible. Quoting from scientific studies, research papers, or historical data carries a much lower legal risk than reusing song lyrics, novels, or poetry, which receive stronger copyright protection.

If you need to use unpublished works, such as personal letters or draft manuscripts, you should always seek explicit permission to avoid infringing on the author’s right to first publication.

When using highly creative material, it is critical to ensure that the use is transformative. Creating a parody, conducting critical commentary, or reinterpreting the work in a new, distinct way strengthens the argument for fair use and lowers the risk of legal challenges.

For Educators and Researchers

Educators and researchers are safest when using factual materials in lectures, academic publications, or educational content. These uses support the goals of dissemination of knowledge without undermining the original work’s market.

When creative materials such as artwork, music, or fiction are necessary, excerpts should be kept brief and tied directly to instructional purposes.

Choosing published works over unpublished ones further strengthens a fair use defense when developing educational resources.

Summary Table: Nature Factor Evaluation

FAQs