CMI Removal (DMCA Section 1202) Explained

---

Definition

CMI, or Copyright Management Information, refers to embedded metadata in digital content that identifies the creator, copyright holder, licensing terms, or usage restrictions. This can include visible elements like watermarks or hidden metadata such as ID3 tags, EXIF data, or ISRC codes.

Section 1202 of the DMCA makes it illegal to intentionally remove, alter, or falsify CMI. It also prohibits distributing content when you know the CMI has been stripped or altered, even if you didn’t do it yourself.

What CMI Removal (§ 1202) Prohibits

Section 1202 is part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and specifically addresses the integrity of attribution and copyright data.

Intentionally removing or altering CMI refers to taking out or changing copyright management information such as the creator’s name, title, license terms, or usage restrictions embedded in or accompanying a digital file.

This action is prohibited when done knowingly and with the intent to conceal ownership or confuse users about the rights associated with a work. CMI appears in image metadata, document headers, and music or video file tags, and its removal can lead to misuse or unauthorized redistribution.

Distributing works where CMI was removed or changed means sharing, publishing, or uploading content that has had its copyright information stripped or falsified – even if the distributor wasn’t the one who made the change.

This provision helps ensure that creative works remain traceable to their original creators and that users receive accurate information about how they may legally use the work. Platforms, publishers, and third-party vendors must be careful not to spread works that have been altered in this way.

Providing false CMI to deceive or facilitate copyright infringement targets those who insert fake attribution, licensing, or ownership data into a work to mislead others.

This could involve falsely claiming authorship, assigning a more permissive license than the creator granted, or tampering with rights metadata to enable unauthorized use. False CMI undermines copyright enforcement, misleads users, and can cause real harm to original creators, especially in automated environments like Content ID systems.

Purpose of Section 1202

The intent behind Section 1202 is to protect creators, publishers, and rights holders by ensuring their identification and licensing instructions remain intact in digital environments.

By making it illegal to strip metadata or author information, § 1202 helps maintain:

• Clear attribution
• License compliance
• Traceability for royalties and permissions

In effect, it’s about protecting the “label” on the file, not just the file itself.

Examples of CMI

Copyright Management Information appears in many common file types, either visibly or invisibly.

CMI can be embedded by the creator or added by digital asset management systems.

When CMI Removal Violates § 1202

Violation occurs when someone knowingly removes or alters CMI, or distributes a work where CMI was removed, and knew or had reason to know it would facilitate infringement.

Cropping Watermarks – Removing visible watermarks from images can break license terms and strip attribution that protects ownership rights.

Stripping Author Info – Some file converters or piracy tools erase embedded authorship data, making it harder to trace the original creator.

Uploading Without Metadata – Re-sharing audio or video without embedded tags like ID3 or EXIF can remove important rights-holder information.

Modifying Identification Codes – Altering ISRCs, ISBNs, or other digital identifiers may misrepresent ownership and trigger false claims or disputes.

Intent is key. Accidental removal or format-based stripping may not count unless the action was willful or reckless.

Penalties for Violation

Violating Section 1202 of the DMCA can result in serious financial and legal consequences, particularly when the actions are intentional or tied to commercial benefit.

Civil penalties range from $2,500 to $25,000 for each act of removal, alteration, or falsification of copyright management information. In addition to statutory damages, violators may also be ordered to pay actual damages and cover the legal fees of the copyright holder.

Criminal penalties apply when someone knowingly removes or falsifies CMI to promote infringement for commercial purposes. In these cases, courts may impose fines up to $500,000 and prison terms of up to five years.

Repeat violations or actions driven by financial gain can lead to even steeper penalties. These strict provisions reflect how seriously U.S. law treats the manipulation of attribution data, especially in digital ecosystems where metadata helps enforce copyright compliance.

How § 1202 Differs from Copyright Infringement

Section 1202 is distinct from traditional copyright infringement under § 106. It protects metadata and attribution, not just the act of copying or using a work without permission.

Even if your use qualifies as fair use, removing metadata may still violate § 1202 independently.

Case Example: Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group (2011)

In this landmark case, a radio group used a photographer’s image and cropped out the visible watermark before posting it on their website.

The court ruled in favor of the photographer, stating that the removal of the watermark – a form of visible CMI – violated Section 1202. The case clarified that removal for convenience or aesthetics is not a defense.

This ruling underscored that creators have the right to preserve visible and embedded authorship markers in their digital works.

Best Practices to Prevent CMI Removal Violations

Creators, editors, and distributors must take proactive steps to protect copyright data and avoid DMCA Section 1202 violations. Even routine editing or uploading can unintentionally remove important metadata if you don’t follow careful practices.

General Guidelines

Preserve metadata whenever you convert, resize, or edit digital files. Many apps strip copyright info by default, so always check before exporting or saving.

Never crop out visible watermarks, credits, or logos without the original creator’s written consent. Removing on-screen attribution can be treated as a deliberate violation.

Avoid uploading files that have been stripped of metadata, especially those from stock libraries or third parties. If you don’t own the file or have permission, don’t modify attribution data.

Use metadata tools like Adobe Bridge, MP3Tag, or ExifTool to inspect and manage author and license info. These tools let you preserve CMI across file edits, exports, and uploads.

For Creators

Add visible watermarks or credit overlays to images and videos before sharing them. This makes attribution clear across reposts and platforms.

Use embedded metadata like EXIF (for photos), ID3 (for audio), or XMP (for documents) to store copyright ownership, license type, and contact information. This ensures attribution data travels with the file.

Registering your work with the U.S. Copyright Office creates a legal record that strengthens your rights in court. It also allows you to pursue statutory damages under DMCA provisions.

Even if you publish your content for free, protecting your metadata ensures proper credit and discourages misuse. Clear CMI supports both ethical reuse and enforcement when necessary.

TL;DR CMI = Copyright Management Information (metadata like author name, copyright notice, license info). DMCA § 1202 prohibits intentionally removing or altering CMI. Violations occur when metadata is stripped or replaced with false data, especially if it enables infringement. Penalties include fines of $2,500–$25,000 per violation, plus criminal liability in severe cases. Always retain metadata, give credit, and use professional tools to manage attribution information responsibly.

FAQs