TEACH Act (Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization Act)

Audiodrome is a royalty-free music platform designed specifically for content creators who need affordable, high-quality background music for videos, podcasts, social media, and commercial projects. Unlike subscription-only services, Audiodrome offers both free tracks and simple one-time licensing with full commercial rights, including DMCA-safe use on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. All music is original, professionally produced, and PRO-free, ensuring zero copyright claims. It’s ideal for YouTubers, freelancers, marketers, and anyone looking for budget-friendly audio that’s safe to monetize.

Definition

The TEACH Act helps schools legally use more copyrighted materials in online classes. Before 2002, many copyright rules focused only on in-person teaching. As digital education grew, teachers needed a way to share content like videos, readings, and music with remote students.

Excerpt from official copyright law highlighting the TEACH Act provision signed on November 2, 2002, supporting use of copyrighted works in distance education.

Source: copyright.gov – U.S. Copyright Office explaining the TEACH Act

The TEACH Act updates the law so accredited nonprofit schools can transmit copyrighted works in digital lessons without getting permission each time. Schools must meet specific requirements to qualify. They have to limit access to enrolled students, use materials that are directly related to teaching, and apply reasonable controls to prevent copying.

The goal is to support education while respecting the rights of creators. By setting clear rules, the TEACH Act encourages innovation in teaching while protecting copyrighted works from misuse in online environments.


Legal Framework of the TEACH Act

The TEACH Act fits into U.S. copyright law by updating section 110 to cover online education. It lets accredited nonprofit schools show or perform copyrighted works in digital classrooms if they follow specific rules. The TEACH Act does not replace fair use. Instead, it offers another way for teachers to use content legally when fair use might not apply.

Fair use under section 107 gives teachers some freedom, but it depends on four factors and often feels uncertain. The traditional classroom exemption under section 110(1) only applies to in-person classes and does not help with online lessons. The TEACH Act bridges this gap, making it easier for teachers to share materials in both live and recorded online courses.

In other parts of the world, the rules are different. European Union law does not have one law like the TEACH Act for distance learning. Instead, EU countries rely on smaller exceptions for education and nonprofit use under the InfoSoc Directive, which can vary a lot between countries.


Key Provisions and Requirements of the TEACH Act

The TEACH Act allows certain schools to share copyrighted materials in online classes, but they must meet strict requirements. It expands opportunities for digital teaching while still protecting the rights of content creators.

Eligible Institutions

The TEACH Act only applies to accredited nonprofit educational institutions and government bodies that offer real instructional programs. Schools that operate for profit cannot use the TEACH Act to justify transmitting copyrighted materials.

Permitted Uses Under the TEACH Act

Eligible institutions can transmit non-dramatic literary or musical works in full during online lessons. They can display reasonable portions of any work, similar to what a teacher might show in a live, physical classroom. They can also perform parts of other types of work, but only when necessary for the lesson and only in appropriate segments.

Exclusions and Limitations

The Act does not allow the use of works created specifically for online education, such as pre-recorded digital training videos. Schools cannot use textbooks, course packs, or other commercial materials under the TEACH Act’s rules. Also, institutions cannot transmit materials if they obtained them through unauthorized copying or other illegal means.


Compliance Requirements for Institutions

To benefit from the TEACH Act, schools must meet specific compliance rules. These steps make sure that copyright protections stay in place while materials are shared in online classrooms.

Technological Safeguards

Schools must use secure systems, such as password-protected learning management platforms, to deliver materials. They must limit access so that only students officially enrolled in the course can view or use the content. Schools also need to use technology that prevents students from keeping or sharing the materials after the lesson ends.

Institutional Policies and Procedures

Every school must have official copyright policies that guide how instructors use digital content. Institutions must appoint a designated agent to manage copyright concerns and respond to any problems. They also have to provide training to teachers and staff so they understand how to legally share digital materials under the TEACH Act.

Notice to Students

Schools must give clear warnings to students about copyright. They need to tell students that the materials are provided only for use in the specific course and that students cannot redistribute, copy, or share them outside the learning environment.


TEACH Act vs. Fair Use in Online Education

The TEACH Act and fair use serve different roles in online education. Schools should use the TEACH Act when they share content during a secure, instructor-led class. The Act requires schools to use safeguards like password-protected platforms and limits access to enrolled students. It works best for traditional lessons that have moved online but still mirror a classroom setting.

Fair use is better for broader situations, such as sharing materials for public commentary, research, or massive open online courses (MOOCs). Fair use looks at four factors to decide if the use is allowed and often carries more risk because it involves judgment calls.

Screenshot explaining the four factors of fair use as recognized by U.S. courts, including purpose, nature, amount used, and market impact.

Source: stanford.edu – Four factors of fair use

For example, if a professor shows a short movie clip during a private, secure online lecture, that use likely falls under the TEACH Act. On the other hand, posting a full copyrighted journal article on a public website would need a fair use analysis and would likely not qualify under the TEACH Act’s protections.


Common Misconceptions and Pitfalls

Many schools misunderstand how the TEACH Act works, which can lead to serious mistakes. Knowing the limits and requirements helps institutions stay protected.

Misconception: “The TEACH Act covers all educational use.”

This is not true. The TEACH Act only applies to certain types of works, like non-dramatic literary or musical works, and only when used by accredited nonprofit institutions. It also requires that the use happen under strict conditions during instruction.

Pitfall: Ignoring Technological Protections

If a school fails to use secure systems, restrict access to enrolled students, or stop unauthorized downloading, it loses the right to claim protection under the TEACH Act. Simply moving a course online without these safeguards is not enough to qualify.

Pitfall: Skipping Policy Documentation

Institutions must create and maintain copyright policies and provide training to instructors and staff. Without clear policies and evidence of proactive compliance, a school cannot rely on the TEACH Act to defend its use of copyrighted materials.


Best Practices for Implementing the TEACH Act

Schools and instructors must take active steps to follow the TEACH Act correctly. Good practices help protect the school, support teachers, and make sure students understand their rights and responsibilities.

Infographic summarizing best practices under the TEACH Act for educators, institutions, and students, including use of open educational resources, copyright policy development, and digital ethics awareness.

For Educators

Teachers should choose open educational resources (OER) whenever they can. These materials are made for free use and often avoid complicated copyright issues. When content falls outside what the TEACH Act covers, teachers should apply the fair use test carefully before using it in class. Planning lessons around legally clear materials saves time and reduces risk.

For Institutions

Schools should create strong, clear copyright policies that explain what teachers and students can and cannot do. They should appoint a copyright compliance officer who can answer questions and handle any problems that arise. Offering annual training on copyright and digital content rules makes sure that faculty and staff stay updated and confident in using materials legally.

For Students

Students must understand that instructional materials are for course use only and should never be shared or downloaded for outside purposes. Schools should give students easy access to clear policies that explain intellectual property rights and the basics of digital ethics.


The Georgia State University case, known as Cambridge University Press v. Patton, did not focus on the TEACH Act but still offers important lessons for schools. The case involved the use of digital course reserves and emphasized the need for institutions to carefully separate fair use from misuse of copyrighted works. It showed that even well-meaning educational uses can cross legal lines if schools do not follow copyright rules closely.

Few courts have directly interpreted the TEACH Act, but that does not mean schools can ignore it. Institutions must be ready to prove they meet all TEACH Act requirements if an audit or legal challenge happens. Courts expect schools to show that they use secure systems, limit access to students, and follow all compliance steps carefully.

Having strong records, clear copyright policies, and regular training can make a major difference if a school ever needs to defend its use of copyrighted materials. Planning ahead and maintaining proper documentation helps institutions stay compliant and lowers the risk of legal problems.


Future of the TEACH Act and Digital Education

The TEACH Act faces new pressures as digital education evolves. Technologies like artificial intelligence, virtual reality, and adaptive learning platforms make it harder for institutions to manage access, prevent unauthorized sharing, and stay fully compliant. Schools may need to update their systems to better secure and track digital materials used in instruction.

Lawmakers have started discussing possible updates to the TEACH Act. Some proposals focus on expanding protections to cover massive open online courses (MOOCs) and partnerships between nonprofit schools and commercial platforms. Others suggest creating new exemptions that support open education while still protecting copyright owners.

Globally, other countries are watching how the U.S. handles digital education and copyright. The European Union, Canada, and Australia have shown interest in aligning their rules to better support distance learning. Future international efforts may focus on harmonizing copyright laws to make cross-border digital teaching easier and more legally secure.

Dragan Plushkovski
Author: Dragan Plushkovski Toggle Bio
Audiodrome logo

Audiodrome was created by professionals with deep roots in video marketing, product launches, and music production. After years of dealing with confusing licenses, inconsistent music quality, and copyright issues, we set out to build a platform that creators could actually trust.

Every piece of content we publish is based on real-world experience, industry insights, and a commitment to helping creators make smart, confident decisions about music licensing.


FAQs

Yes. The Act does not cover full performances of dramatic audiovisual works like movies, plays, operas, or musical theater. Only reasonable and limited portions of these types of works can be transmitted for teaching. Commercial educational materials, such as textbooks or course packs, are also excluded.

No. The TEACH Act only covers instructor-led performances or displays during official instructional activities. It does not authorize peer-to-peer sharing or independent student distribution of copyrighted content, even if it relates to coursework.

Yes, but only if you continue to meet the Act’s requirements. Recordings must stay behind secure systems, be limited to enrolled students, and be removed when the course ends if no longer needed. Posting recordings on public websites or open platforms would likely violate the Act.

No. The Act and the DMCA are two different laws. The Act focuses on performances and displays for distance education. The DMCA deals with digital rights management and protecting copyrighted works against unauthorized copying or distribution. Both laws affect online education but serve different purposes.