DRM Exemption (Triennial Rulemaking)

---

Definition

The DRM Exemption (Triennial Rulemaking) is a recurring legal process under Section 1201 of the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Every three years, the U.S. Copyright Office, through the Librarian of Congress, reviews and approves limited exemptions that permit circumvention of Digital Rights Management (DRM).

These exemptions are granted only when DRM interferes with lawful uses, such as repair, accessibility, or archival preservation. The process is designed to balance copyright protection with the public’s right to access, fix, or study digital content.

How the DRM Exemption (Triennial Rulemaking) Works

The rulemaking follows a structured petition-and-review process. Each exemption request is evaluated based on evidence of harm caused by DRM.

Step 1: Public Petitions
The triennial rulemaking begins when individuals, educators, libraries, or advocacy groups submit petitions requesting new exemptions. These petitions must clearly explain how DRM prevents lawful use, such as education, repair, or accessibility, and show that this restriction causes real harm to users.

Step 2: Copyright Office Review
The U.S. Copyright Office reviews each petition and gathers input from stakeholders. This includes legal briefs, technical research, and public comments. For significant or disputed requests, the Office may hold public hearings to explore the issue in greater depth and clarify the arguments on both sides.

Step 3: Librarian of Congress Decision
After the review, the Librarian of Congress evaluates the evidence and issues a final decision. Only the most well-supported and clearly defined exemptions are approved. These decisions determine which DRM-related actions are temporarily allowed under Section 1201.

Step 4: Exemptions Published and Activated
Once approved, exemptions are published in the Federal Register and become legally valid. They stay in effect for three years. If not re-evaluated and renewed in the next cycle, they automatically expire, requiring petitioners to restart the process.

Current (2024–2027) Exemptions

The most recent set of exemptions became effective in October 2024 and will remain in force until October 2027. They address several modern issues, especially around repair, education, and digital access. In the latest cycle, the DRM Exemption (Triennial Rulemaking) approved these use-cases:

Approved Exemptions (2024)

Key Restrictions

Exemptions do not legalize the distribution of circumvention tools. Even if breaking DRM is permitted for a specific purpose, sharing or selling the software, code, or devices that enable it is still prohibited under Section 1201.

Users must qualify for an exemption based on individual circumstances. For example, someone repairing a smartphone must own the device, and educators must be part of a recognized institution to rely on education-related exemptions.

Each exemption is time-limited. After three years, it automatically expires unless petitioners resubmit evidence showing continued harm and the Copyright Office approves its renewal.

Exemptions are narrow in scope. They apply only to specific uses, devices, and user groups. For instance, jailbreaking may be allowed for smartphones but not for gaming consoles or other restricted hardware. Users must verify that their actions fall within the precise boundaries of the current rule.

Controversies & Limitations

Despite offering legal workarounds, the Triennial Rulemaking process has been criticized for being too slow, limited, and reactive.

Notable Rejected Petitions

These denials reflect a cautious approach, often favoring industry rights over broader user freedoms.

How to Use an Exemption Legally

If your activity falls under an approved exemption, it must be carried out within specific conditions to remain lawful. Steps to Ensure Compliance:

Step 1: Check Current Rulings
Start by reviewing the most recent exemption list at the U.S. Copyright Office’s website. This ensures that your activity is covered and helps you understand the specific terms attached to each exemption. The list changes every three years, so always confirm you’re using the most up-to-date information.

Step 2: Confirm Eligibility
Make sure your situation matches the criteria for the exemption. This includes verifying that you own the device or media and that your intended use, such as repair, accessibility, or teaching, fits the approved purpose. Misusing an exemption can still lead to legal risk.

Step 3: Don’t Distribute Tools
Even if your actions are permitted under an exemption, you can’t legally share, sell, or download tools designed to break DRM. The exemption protects the act of circumvention, not the distribution of the means. To stay compliant, carry out the activity yourself without relying on unauthorized software or services.

Global Comparisons

Other countries also regulate DRM, but few use the same cyclical exemption model. Several jurisdictions offer broader, more permanent allowances.

These international models reflect greater legal flexibility for education, research, and accessibility, compared to the more rigid U.S. process.

Future of the Rulemaking

The Triennial Rulemaking continues to evolve in response to legal pressure, technological advancement, and public advocacy.

Right-to-Repair Movement

Public interest groups and repair advocates continue to call for permanent legal protections that allow individuals and technicians to fix their own devices. Laws passed in states like New York and Minnesota now mandate that manufacturers provide access to tools, parts, and manuals.

These efforts directly challenge Section 1201 by arguing that DRM restrictions prevent lawful, beneficial repair work and create monopolies around maintenance. Advocates believe that users should have full control over the products they own, including the right to diagnose and repair them without facing legal risk.

AI and Emerging DRM Challenges

As AI systems increasingly rely on large datasets, new conflicts are emerging around DRM-protected content. Some researchers argue that fair use should permit limited access for training machine learning models, especially when no commercial distribution occurs.

Archivists and preservationists also warn that DRM could permanently restrict access to cultural works, including old video games, educational materials, and eBooks that are no longer sold but remain valuable. Without future exemptions, entire categories of digital history may become inaccessible.

Reform Efforts

Digital rights organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation are working to remove the prohibition on sharing circumvention tools, especially when the use itself is legal. They argue that restricting the tools while allowing the action makes the exemption practically useless.

Some legal scholars advocate for shifting the current framework by requiring copyright holders to prove that a DRM restriction is necessary. This change would reverse the burden of proof and create a more balanced system that respects both copyright and user rights.

Quick Summary: Triennial Rulemaking Overview

FAQs